All the trash trees save one are now gone from my property. Below are links to panoramic shots of my trashy back yard, one before and one after the tree removal.
If you look carefully, you may be able to see the remaining tree. It is directly under the TXU power line, so I have to call TXU out to remove it.
The tree removal company’s two trucks were chock full of debris:
Our next task is to sod that yard!
Some coworkers and I had a lively discussion about the Gubernator‘s “girlie man” comment.
An awfully literal interpretation is “a man who is like a little girl,” a supposed backhanded insult to girls and gays.
But do we always intend the technical, literal meaning of every word? If I call you a “moron” or “nimrod” do I literally mean that you are mentally retarded or an ancient hunter? No, I mean that you are a bonehead. (Disclaimer: I didn’t literally mean your head is made of bone!)
“Girlie man” comes from a goofy Saturday Night Live skit featuring steroidal “Hans und Frans.” Anyone who wasn’t equally “pumped up” got labeled a “girlie man.” It was a goofball, witty skit.
By making an issue of such a lighthearted double-entendre, which by the way was given at an informal, almost spur of the moment shopping mall pep rally, California Democrats are distracting voters from the real problem: special interests. That’s not a partisan issue.
Outside I-820:
Crossing I-820:
Inside the loop!
Normally you would expect lower limits as you approach major areas of a city. Thanks to environmental speed limits, the speed limit on the outlying stretch of TX 121 is arbitrarily restrained at 60 MPH.
In the Dallas/Fort Worth area, all roadways with a 70 and 65 MPH speed limit before Sept. 1, 2001 were remarked with 65 and 60 MPH speed limits, respectively. This was a ballyhooed part of a massive smog reduction plan.
This speed reduction measure may bring the area 0.1% closer to its smog goal with “may” being the operative word. Yes, that’s one tenth of a percent! If you consider the paradoxical effects of low speed limits, mainly less respect for the entire body of traffic laws, these lower speed limits may have actually increased emissions!
Anyway, the 2001 speed limit reductions were carefully defined road by road. (Map of actual roadway segments with reduced limits.) In 2003, the Texas Legislature prospectively banned environmental speed limit reductions. This means that current reductions can stay, but no future reductions may happen.
Now the DFW area is left with a weird patchwork of speed limit reductions. Some highways have reduced speed limits and some don’t. But first a little background.
While it is not published anywhere, TxDOT’s de facto standard in major urban areas is to use 70 MPH speed limits until you reach the outer loop (e.g., Sam Houston Tollway), 65 MPH limits between the outer loop and the inner loop (e.g., I-610), 60 MPH limits between downtown and the inner loop, and sometimes 55 or 50 MPH limits on certain downtown freeways with many exits (e.g., I-30 near downtown Dallas). This is an arbitrary practice that seems to be in place mainly due to communal reinforcement and “monkey see monkey do.” In all my driving experience in Texas the only exception to this rule I have ever experienced is the 65 MPH limit that used to be on US-59 southwest of Houston between the Buffalo Speedway and Beltway 8.
With environmental speed limits, the new arbitrary standard is that once you cross a county line nearest to about 50 miles from downtown, the speed limit goes from 70 to 65, and then to 60 once you cross the outer loop. Speed limits then stagnated at 60 for miles and miles until they dropped once again near downtown.
Now in Ft. Worth, there is a major exception to the rule. By the PDF map you can see that Texas 121 between I-35W and I-820 in Ft. Worth was not subject to the environmental speed limit reduction. This is because its speed limit on Sept. 1, 2001 was 60 MPH or lower. Since then the TxDOT has apparently re-speed zoned that roadway and found that a 65 MPH limit is more appropriate, so this entire segment now has a 65 MPH speed limit.
TxDOT’s Dallas District is in the process of reviewing all Dallas-area roadways. Since no inner-loop speed limit is subject to speed limit reductions, it is very possible that the Dallas area could experience a patchwork of highly inconsistent speed limit policy where some freeways get higher limits the closer you get to downtown Dallas.
I don’t agree with the arbitrarily low speed limits that end up posted on most highways, but I also don’t agree with inconsistent speed limit policy. One standard should be followed on all roadways, and it should not be hamstrung by the political will of the day.
How can this be fixed? Three easy ways:
Last year I purchased a Melnor 4200 water sprinkler from Home Depot. It looks like this:
I have read from various places that you should give your lawn at least a full inch of water every time you water it.
What amazed me is that after this Melnor sprinkler ran at full blast for an hour and 10 minutes, it had delivered so little water that I couldn’t see much water some containers I set up around the yard. (This is a common way to determine the output of your sprinkler.) I don’t think this is a problem with the sprinkler per se; I just need to leave the sprinkler running for hours at a time to get the deep water penetration necessary to encourage deep roots.
Update: After 3 hours of watering, the rain cups barely measured 1/2 inch!
Many apparently believe that the US President uses magical levers to control the economy. Apparently Reagan and Clinton pushed the levers to “full steam ahead,” but Bush I and Bush II chose to pull the levers back to “slow.” It’s all Bush’s fault that we’re barely emerging from a recession, right?
Bull corn! What silly logic. Suddenly we forgot the hangover from the irrational exuberance of the late ’90s, 9-11, and general global instability? Somehow the current President is entirely to blame for these? Ever heard of something called the business cycle?
If presidents really had such clearly-labeled levers to pull, then every president in history, regardless of party, would prevail over an expanding economy.
