American Airlines’s $30 baggage tax: deceptive and dishonest

American Airlines Sucks!American Airlines’s new $30 baggage tax is deceptive and dishonest:

  1. DECEPTION: It’s not $15 as advertised. It’s $15 each way. That’s a whopping $30 tax for the vast majority of passengers.
  2. DISHONEST: It’s not upfront. All costs incurred by the vast majority of passengers should be upfront and non-hidden. Otherwise, it’s much more difficult to do an apples-to-apples comparison of competitors. Orbitz and Travelocity won’t be able to tell you that American Airlines will cost $30 more than listed. (This is a big reason why service industry loves tips: lets them create an illusion of lower prices.)

In a lengthy missive, AA’s PR chief Tim Wagner claims this is necessary to recoup costs. Sorry, Tim, nothing justifies dishonesty and deception.

My wife and I may both fly this summer. Even though we will be reimbursed, we are doing whatever we can to avoid American Airlines.

Nutty inter-blog linkage

On the top of my Google Mail (which I highly recommend), I see a headline reading Engaged – Refurbished iPhones are an excellent source of previous users’ data. I click.

Obviously that’s not the article source, so I click on the source link and come to The Unofficial Apple Weblog’s Refurb iPhones still contain previous users’ data.

That’s not the original source! I follow a link to iPhone Atlas’s Refurbished iPhones may contain other users’ personal data.

That’s not the original source! I follow a link to another iPhone Atlas article: Warning: iPhone “Restore” does not delete personal data.

That’s not the original source! I follow a link to a blog named Jonathan’s Grits ‘n Butter.

Finally, the source!

Lazy, amateur journalism! This is the internet. Linking to the source is easy. Why make it so difficult to find?

Bubble economy?

I think we’re in a temporary economic reality where we jump from economic bubble to economic bubble.

Think about it: the late ’90s was the stock bubble, the early to mid-2000s were the residential real estate bubble, and now the late ’00s is a commodities bubble.

Remember the “goldilocks economy”, where everything was “just right” for growth? When that bubble popped, investors turned to the perceived safety of real estate, which in fact had been appreciating well for a few years. I remember representatives of the National Association of Realtors analysts ridiculously explaining away the bubble by exaggerating long term demand.

The popping of the real estate bubble was perceived to be so economically influential that investors ran for traditional “bad times” commodity hedges. Now we have oil, food, and metal prices that are likely far above prices justified by market fundamentals.

Seriously, is there enough sudden new demand across so many commodity categories as to drive up their prices so sharply in the past few months? I can’t see any. For once, I believe OPEC: world oil markets are sufficiently supplied. And sure, the number of mouths to feed and per-capita food consumption are increasing, but enough to suddenly cause a global food crisis?

If I had money to speculate, I would short sell commodities with a two year time horizon. I just don’t see this commodity bubble lasting, especially as the dollar appreciates and investors become interested in less speculative investments.

That being said, some long-term trends are undeniable. Oil has nowhere to go but up over the decades. But in the immediate term, I don’t see how current prices are justified.

Bad kitty news

Looks like this will be a kitty-free household soon.

We took the newer cat, Olivia, back to the SPCA on Saturday. I had been putting this off, but it was inevitable. She is simply not compatible with small kids. Her extreme skittishness caused her to hide almost all the time, so I was unable to even try training her not to scratch furniture.

I don’t know what happened. When she was little, she would sleep on me. Something changed in her head as she emerged from kittenhood.

We tried placing her with others in our area, but none were interested.

She was an SPCA adoption, so the return was free. (Normally there is a $50 surrender charge.)

Ameila, the older cat with fatty liver syndrome, has taken a turn for the worse. About a week after the hospitalization, the remainder of her skin started yellowing. Now even her eyes are yellowing.

The 2 week follow up vet visit was on Saturday, and the vet said she’s doing so poorly that he didn’t strongly recommend more treatment.

Part of me that wonders if Amelia is still treatable; I found an academic report that described “terminal” cats with hepatic lipidosis coming from the brink with feeding tubes, but my realistic side says the writing is on the wall. I am unwilling to spend more hundreds of dollars on a 12 year old cat who has never been particularly robust. And as much as I am upset at her upcoming death, I am not one of those “furkid” types. I guess it’s just time.

Good and bad kitty news

The worst news: it’s not good when the nurse says “oh my gosh” when tallying up your bill! This vet visit set me back way more Benjamins than I ever wanted to spend on a pet. X-rays, lab tests, prescriptions, IVs, and 2 days of “hospitalization” aren’t cheap.

The best news: Amelia is home:

And everything in between: Ameila has a reasonable shot at recovery. The lab tests and X-rays didn’t find anything startling except markers typical of a cat whose liver isn’t working right. The blood test suggested somewhere around 20% liver function, and the X-ray didn’t find that her liver extended past her ribcage boundary, which is what the vet wanted to see.

Amelia is on oral antibiotics and Denosyl for several more days.

Here’s what her ear looks like:

Lovely yellow tint. The vet says this will stick around for at least 2 weeks because it doesn’t immediately flush out.

She seems a little off kilter: sleeping more and unsteady on her feet. Hopefully she’ll return to her normal geriatric (12 year old) self soon.